For elevation from the scalp [3]. However, like autologous reconstructions, current tissue-engineered auricular reconstructions are limited in their ability to accurately mimic normal auricular anatomy or biomechanical properties, let alone patient-specific anatomy. In this study, we have overcome these obstacles through the application of a novel method for construct design and fabrication. The digital photogrammetric acquisition of data utilized Title Loaded From File herein allows for highresolution image capture without the risk of radiation exposure.Furthermore, as the image acquisition process is rapid (,60 seconds), the need to subject children to restraints, sedatives or even general anesthesia to prevent movement is obviated. Lastly, constructs fabricated by these means represent exact mirror images of patients’ contralateral normal ears and thus offer the potential for superior aesthetic outcomes surpassing even the most experienced hands. In the case of bilateral microtia, anatomically appropriate ears could be chosen from a “library” of patient images. Historically, the failure of scaffolds to maintain their size is among the major obstacles of auricular tissue engineering [3,12]. Inadequate cell seeding, incomplete replacement of the original scaffold by neocartilage deposition [2,8], inability to withstand contractile forces in vivo [2], and “infiltration of noncartilaginous tissues” [8] have all been hypothesized to be causative factors. In addition, it is nearly impossible to evaluate how these factors contribute to scaffold deformation or degradation, as the majority of studies that investigate the potential for tissue engineering of elastic auricular cartilage utilize only sheets or fragments of material [5,8], or ear-shaped constructs based upon molds fromTissue Engineering of Patient-Specific Auriclesvery small children (1? years) [6,9,11,22], and not school-aged children (whose ears are ,80 of their adult size). In contrast to previous studies [2,22], our cellular constructs successfully maintained not only their original dimensions but also their topography over time. We believe this successful preservation of their shape and size is attributable to the injectable, high-density collagen type I scaffold, which has not yet to our knowledge been described for the fabrication of full-sized, anatomically-correct facsimiles of the external ear (without the bolstering of an internal wire support). Not only did chondrocyte-containing specimens in this study demonstrate the deposition of copious elastic neocartilage highly similar to native human elastic with Title Loaded From File respect to both overall architecture and elastin content [23], but cellular specimens did not change appreciably in size during the interval of implantation. This suggests that the process of neocartilage deposition likely occurred at a rate similar to that of collagen degradation. Although the longest time point included in this study was 3 months, several earlier studies demonstrated construct shrinkage or deformation by this time [2,4,9,22]. Rather than using type I collagen native to inelastic, weightbearing tendons, it may seem more intuitive to use type II collagen as the basis for our construct bulk. However, the use of type II collagen in our injection molding system is problematic, as its solubility is insufficient to yield the high-density (i.e., 15?0 mg/ ml) hydrogels needed to retain dimensional stability after molding. Indeed, studies using type II collagen hydrogels as a s.For elevation from the scalp [3]. However, like autologous reconstructions, current tissue-engineered auricular reconstructions are limited in their ability to accurately mimic normal auricular anatomy or biomechanical properties, let alone patient-specific anatomy. In this study, we have overcome these obstacles through the application of a novel method for construct design and fabrication. The digital photogrammetric acquisition of data utilized herein allows for highresolution image capture without the risk of radiation exposure.Furthermore, as the image acquisition process is rapid (,60 seconds), the need to subject children to restraints, sedatives or even general anesthesia to prevent movement is obviated. Lastly, constructs fabricated by these means represent exact mirror images of patients’ contralateral normal ears and thus offer the potential for superior aesthetic outcomes surpassing even the most experienced hands. In the case of bilateral microtia, anatomically appropriate ears could be chosen from a “library” of patient images. Historically, the failure of scaffolds to maintain their size is among the major obstacles of auricular tissue engineering [3,12]. Inadequate cell seeding, incomplete replacement of the original scaffold by neocartilage deposition [2,8], inability to withstand contractile forces in vivo [2], and “infiltration of noncartilaginous tissues” [8] have all been hypothesized to be causative factors. In addition, it is nearly impossible to evaluate how these factors contribute to scaffold deformation or degradation, as the majority of studies that investigate the potential for tissue engineering of elastic auricular cartilage utilize only sheets or fragments of material [5,8], or ear-shaped constructs based upon molds fromTissue Engineering of Patient-Specific Auriclesvery small children (1? years) [6,9,11,22], and not school-aged children (whose ears are ,80 of their adult size). In contrast to previous studies [2,22], our cellular constructs successfully maintained not only their original dimensions but also their topography over time. We believe this successful preservation of their shape and size is attributable to the injectable, high-density collagen type I scaffold, which has not yet to our knowledge been described for the fabrication of full-sized, anatomically-correct facsimiles of the external ear (without the bolstering of an internal wire support). Not only did chondrocyte-containing specimens in this study demonstrate the deposition of copious elastic neocartilage highly similar to native human elastic with respect to both overall architecture and elastin content [23], but cellular specimens did not change appreciably in size during the interval of implantation. This suggests that the process of neocartilage deposition likely occurred at a rate similar to that of collagen degradation. Although the longest time point included in this study was 3 months, several earlier studies demonstrated construct shrinkage or deformation by this time [2,4,9,22]. Rather than using type I collagen native to inelastic, weightbearing tendons, it may seem more intuitive to use type II collagen as the basis for our construct bulk. However, the use of type II collagen in our injection molding system is problematic, as its solubility is insufficient to yield the high-density (i.e., 15?0 mg/ ml) hydrogels needed to retain dimensional stability after molding. Indeed, studies using type II collagen hydrogels as a s.